WE DID NOT HEAR ABOUT THIS IMPORTANT ISSUE

The reason these critical issues go unnoticed is because of the Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrats) and their comrades in the media.  The Marxist philosophy is now a part of American culture and since Americans have not studied this evil and do not recognize it our children are less and less under the influence of the parents and more and more a product of the indoctrinating state schools.  Remember the Marxist Belief: Children Belong To The State; “Belong To The Whole Community” – Like Good Little Communists.  Critical to the Marxist agenda is and always has been the destruction of the family and dependence on the State.

The other day, parents of students in public schools were asked to join a “Sex Ed Sit Out” by keeping their elementary and middle-school students out of school for one day. Organizers in the United States and Canada, as well as some Australian cities, were participating in reaction to what they consider the sexualization of children under the guise of education, through the use of sexually explicit materials in classrooms.
 
“Why are our tax dollars going to pay for resources that teach dangerous and promiscuous behaviors which most parents find morally abhorrent and the CDC has stated are a health risk?” asked parents. “We are fed up. Enough is enough.”
 
A former teacher explained, “We are uniting with parents across the globe to demand that our rights as parents be respected regarding the teaching of sexuality and sexual orientation. Hands off our kids!”
 
New attention was directed at public school sex-ed programs last year, when The Red Crayon, a story about a child’s gender “transition,” was read to a kindergarten class at a public charter school in California. The kindergarten teacher then re-introduced a boy classmate to the children as a “girl,” which reportedly traumatized several children in the class. Because the instruction isn’t classified as “sex education,” parents were not advised in advance about the material and had no opportunity to opt-out.
 
An executive director of the North Carolina Values Coalition, which is a sponsor for the Sex Ed Sit Out, was asked by parents in the Charlotte, North Carolina area to help them fight the Welcoming Schools curriculum, which was tested for adoption in their county. When parents were told they could not photograph pages of the program material, they began to suspect that a stealth campaign to forestall parental objection was in place.
 
Welcoming Schools was promoted as a program created for elementary schools to teach “family diversity” and build “gender-inclusive, non-binary schools” free from bullying. “What about the bullying of parents and children who object to this perverse ideology?” others asked. The program, developed by the LGBT advocacy group the Human Rights Campaign, subjects students to opposite-gender role-play, and encourages them to cross-dress and to view traditional attitudes of family structure as harmful, Fitzgerald said; students with questions are referred to Planned Parenthood.
 
Planned Parenthood is also behind another curriculum causing concern for parents—Get Real is a sex-education program for sixth and seventh graders. Parents in Cumberland County, North Carolina began to voice complaints about Get Real when it was introduced in their schools, pointing to graphic descriptions of sexual acts and advice for children such as using plastic wrap as a form of protection during oral sex.
 
The Get Real program alarmed parents who objected to its promotion of homosexuality because its encouraging gender confusion among students, and its “jaw-dropping descriptions of various acts.”
 
The implementation of these programs and others like them are the motivation behind the Sex Ed Sit Out. Organizers provided parents with a letter that could be sent to school principals explaining their protest. “We send our children to school and pay for your services through our taxes so that our children can learn reading, writing, science and history, not how to question their gender or how to have anal and oral sex,” the letter read. The letter made note of several programs other than Welcoming Schools and Get Real, including Making Proud Choices and Safe Schools. The letter also took aim at the lack of transparency about the adoption of these programs in some schools and districts, saying that this makes it difficult for parents to opt out of programs they deem harmful for their children.
 
Another factor working against parents who do not want their children exposed to this material is the fact that these comprehensive programs push gender ideology and sexual behavior across the curriculum—in science, English, and history classes, for example, as well as health and life-skills classes. Because the objectionable content is woven throughout the entire curriculum, parents often cannot remove their student from a single offensive class.
 
The fact that objectionable content is often packaged as “anti-bullying” or “relationships” education, rather than sex education, can also make it difficult for parents looking to opt out. A memo to the Orange County Board of Education was recently circulated online, in which the Board’s legal counsel advises that the California Healthy Youth Act allows parents to remove their children from sex and HIV education, but that this does not apply to programs covering “gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, discrimination, harassment, bullying, intimidation, relationships, or family.”
 
And so, the Marxist/Progressives continue to use the education system for a system of indoctrination.  Parents, you gave away the schools, your only option is to take them back.  Get involved immediately.