|
|
Fascism, is Communism, Naziism & Socialism Are All Just Variations of Collectivism. The Battle Isn’t Right vs. Left. It’s Statism vs. Individualism.
That the National Socialists embraced socialism is factually accurate. …they did nationalize very vital industry in Germany, even if by outright intimidation rather than through the law. In his personal diaries, Joseph Goebbels wrote in late 1925: “It would be better for us to end our existence under Bolshevism than to endure slavery under capitalism.” Only a few months later, he continued, “I think it is terrible that we and the Communists are bashing in each other’s heads.” Whatever the state of the rivalry between the two camps, Goebbels claimed, the two forces should ally and conquer. …The Italian fascists had even closer ties to the Marxists, with Mussolini having begun his career as a Marxist publicist and writer. A few Italian fascists even held positions in the Comintern. Fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax… Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. …Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions. …Fascism is to be distinguished from interventionism, or the mixed economy. Interventionism seeks to guide the market process, not eliminate it, as fascism did. …Under fascism, the state, through official cartels, controlled all aspects of manufacturing, commerce, finance, and agriculture. Those who call for big government, those who advocate for democracy, which Plato told us is dictatorship, those who call to eliminate individual liberties are collectivists. Collectivism has different varieties, but they all demand total control by a large, centralized government, a dictatorial bureaucratic government that does not answer to the electorate, and a belief and practice that the ends always justify the means. Now you know. You decide who is a fascist, who is calling for government control and mandates over the lives of the people, who is calling for more distribution of wealth, who is calling for liberties being abridged, who is demanding all conform to their ideology.
0 Comments
There really is no other way to describe what is happening with the Biden regime. Biden said in his campaign, “I want you to look at my eyes. I guarantee you; I guarantee you we’re going to end fossil fuels.” After he was declared the winner of the election, despite overwhelming evidence that the election was stolen, and he was inaugurated to be the first illegitimately elected president, Biden set about destroying the United States fossil fuel industry. Within months the United States was no longer energy independent, but the United States again became energy dependent on the middle east countries and Russia. This despite the fact that the United States has the most fossil fuel deposits of any country.
When Biden shut down the fossil fuel industry in the United States the price of energy skyrocketed. The price of gas at our pumps tripled and quadrupled causing inflation not seen in decades. The energy prices in Europe have also risen, but at multiples even greater than ours. Biden then encouraged, no begged Putin to invade Ukraine. Putin did. As the West supplied Ukraine, Putin shut of energy to the European Union nations. With winter coming, the European Nations are facing a cold winter and little or no way to heat their homes. Power prices in Europe continue to smash records, intensifying the region's energy crisis and fanning fears about access to electricity and heating as the weather begins to cool. German power prices for next year, which are considered Europe's benchmark, briefly jumped above €1,000 ($999.80) per megawatt hour on Monday before falling back to €840 ($839.69) per megawatt hour. France's nuclear sector, which provides about 70% of the country's electricity, is also struggling with lower output, pushing up the country's energy prices. The Czech Republic announced Monday that it would convene an emergency meeting of Europe's energy ministers in Brussels next week as the region hunts for solutions. This is the climate change crowd that has told us fossil fuels must be eliminated so the planet will be saved. Of course, that is a lie. The climate change crowd has as its goal to bring about a globalist government under communism. What all are learning is that there is no climate crisis, and green energy can not supply the needed energy. The solution of the climate change crowd; The Biden administration has continued private negotiations with Western allies to implement a global cap on the price of Russian oil to avoid a potential gas price disaster. The supposed cap on Russian oil would be $50 a barrel. The climate change crowd believes they have the control to enforce this cap. That is naïve, foolish, but really stupid. If Russian stops supplying any energy to Europe, it will have to close down. Russia can sell its energy to others, China, Cuba, and North Korea for starters. The climate change crowd is not in charge. There is a solution however, and that solution would benefit the United States. That solution would be to remove all production restrictions on the fossil fuel industry in the United States. The climate change crowd would have to admit they have been lying of course, but reasonable and rationale people knew this anyway. There is no climate crisis. There never was a climate crisis. Fossil fuels are necessary for the world’s economy. The economic revival in the United States would be immediate and Europe would not be far behind. For years San Francisco has been looked upon as the hotbed of the communist movement in the United States. This was deserved. After all, it is San Francisco who has given us Pelosi, Feinstein, Boxer, Harris, Newsom and so many other committed communists. Has the movement to communism in San Francisco shown the people of San Francisco what the world has always known, and that is that communism does not work, it is a failure, it brings poverty, crime, chaos, and breakdown in society.
The people of San Francisco are saying enough is enough. It was the people of San Francisco who told their woke school board members that they and their evil and destructive policies were no longer wanted nor needed. It was the people of San Francisco who recalled their Soros financed District Attorney. The people told Soros to take his money and go home because the people of San Francisco no longer were willing to support the criminal over the victim and the honest citizen. Now it is the people of San Francisco who are telling their city to clean up their streets, to get rid of the criminal, to police their streets, and to provide the services for which the citizens are paying. If this is not done, the people are saying we will no longer pay taxes. The people have said the taxes they are paying are not going for the purposes they were told were the reasons they must pay taxes. Small business owners in San Francisco’s Castro District are demanding city officials take action to address the growing issues of crime, drug use, and homelessness in the area. The Castro Merchants Association sent a letter to San Francisco city officials saying members of the group plan to stop paying taxes if the city doesn't do more to address the issues. “Our community is struggling to recover from lost business revenue, from burglaries and never-ending vandalism/graffiti (often committed by unhoused persons) and we implore you to take action,” stated the letter. Thank you San Francisco for showing other people that meaningful action can be taken. People in all cities controlled by the woke left, where the woke left has controlled elections to keep their people in office, can follow the lead of San Francisco and get rid of communist school board members, Soros financed District Attorneys, and communist city leaders. It does take courage, it does require reasonable and rationale thinking, it does require that people are willing to move beyond the ostracizing and demonizing, and it does require that people are willing to stand against the evil of the left. Thank you San Francisco for showing that it can be done. Yes, if it can be done in San Francisco, it can be done anywhere. The question is, will the people of anywhere have the same courage and resolve that the people of San Francisco have shown? Our nation has moved over the border of sanity and are now in the state of leftist insanity. We are told by the Democrats (Communist Party of the United States) and the RINOS (the useful idiots of the Communists), that we who are Freedom Loving Americans are extreme. In their world of Marxism, yes we would be extreme, but in the world of freedom and liberty, we are the sane.
The Democrats, joined by the RINOS, are telling us that it is extreme to take the position that it is not right to kill children just because they have not yet been born, that it is wrong to say that the states and not the federal government have jurisdiction over this question, even though our Constitution specifically demands federalism. The Democrats, joined by the RINOS, are telling us that it is best to punish achievement and reward failure. They tell us we Freedom Loving Americans are extreme when we say to acknowledge those who work hard and achieve is good, and that it is wrong to lower standards to accommodate the underachievers. We are told we are extreme racists for protecting the rights to achieve of all regardless of sex, race, or color. The Democrats, joined by the RINOS, are telling us that there are many genders, certainly many more than two, and that we Freedom Loving Americans are extreme when we say that we are all born male or female, and a declaration to the contrary does not change that fact. We Freedom Loving Americans are extreme when we believe there are two genders. The Democrats, joined by the RINOS, are telling us that those who have committed crimes are not guilty, but it is society who is guilty of those crimes, and society must be punished, not the individual criminal. We Freedom Loving Americans are extreme, we are told, when we say that the individual is responsible for the crimes they commit. The Democrats, joined by the RINOS, are telling us that big government is the answer to any and every problem and situation, that it is the critical role of government to tell each person how they must live their life, the choices they must make, and how they must think. We Freedom Loving Americans are told we are extreme when we say and mean, “Government that governs least, governs best.” I could give many more examples of where the Democrats and RINOS are telling us that we Freedom Loving Americans are extreme and that the values of the Collectivist (communist, Marxist, socialist, Democrat) ideology are mainstream and positive for society. However, we Freedom Loving Americans have values that history proves bring about peace and prosperity, reduces crime and poverty, and brings about harmony for the greater numbers. Our values, although referred to now as extreme by those who hold the same values as have all despotic tyrants through history, the values of Freedom Loving American, are the values upon which our nation was built and prospered. There are only two required steps to leave the state of insanity, that state the Democrats and RINOS are offering, and return to the state of sanity. One of those two steps is to return to being a republic, reject democracy, and adhere to the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution of the United States places limitations on the power of government and refutes centralized power, and it declares unabashedly that the liberties of the people can never be abridged, infringed, or eliminated. The other step we must take, and this is the most critical step, this is the step that will truly bring about peace and prosperity within our nation, and that is to return to the ultimate principle upon which our nation was founded, and that is that the Bible is the ultimate textbook, it is the teachings of the Bible to which we must adhere, that God is ultimately in charge and when we follow the values and teachings found within the Bible, we will have the answer for any and all situations that arise. Our Constitution states that there can be no restrictions placed on worship of God. The Democrats and RINOS have told us that we are taking an extreme position when we promote that basic principle, and yet that is the number one principle upon which our nation was founded. We Freedom Loving Americans are then only as extreme as our Founding Fathers. The left, also referred to as the progressive movement, is fascinated with killing humans or what is more commonly known as murder. Abortion, choice, or what is murder of babies, has been the rallying cry of the American Left for years.
Tom Perez, a former DNC chair, said that "every Democrat, like every American, should support a woman's right to make her own choices about her body and her health." Support for abortion, he continued, is "not negotiable and should not change city by city or state by state" and that the party "must speak up for this principle as loudly as ever and with one voice". Some “progressives” are now supporting making it legal to kill babies up to 28 days after they have been born. The question to be asked, is why 28 days, why not 28 weeks, or 28 months, or 28 years? Not only is legalized murder supported at the beginning of life, and remember that conception is the beginning of life, but now it is called for at any time. Oregon's Death with Dignity Act allows terminally ill Oregon residents to obtain and use prescriptions from their physicians for self-administered, lethal medications. Physicians and patients who follow the act's requirements are protected from criminal prosecution. Oregon has recently amended this law to include non-residents. We are now learning about the Canadian health care system’s planned expansion of medically assisted suicide and the shockingly low bar required for administering such procedures. So called assisted suicide has been granted to a 61-year-old who anticipated hearing loss. In the Netherlands there has been a sharp increase in people seeking medically assisted suicide for causes associated with mental illness in recent years, even people in their 20’s. The requirement to be a victim of assisted suicide is that someone has determined that the victim understands the process is not reversible. What we are witnessing, is what we witness in all societies where collectivism is trending, and that is making a way for the state to eventually determine who is a liability to society and must receive assisted suicide. In the United States we now have an FBI and a DOJ who determine who should be prosecuted for political purposes. Who should be the victim of assisted suicide for political purposes can not be far behind. NYT Essay Claims, ‘Broken Constitution’ Stands in Way of ‘Real’ Democracy
This is the very reason we have the Constitution of the United States, and that is to stand in the way or “Real” Democracy. In a Times essay, two Ivy League professors declared the “broken” and “famously undemocratic” U.S. Constitution “stands in the way” of “real” freedom and democracy, while issuing a call to “radically alter the basic rules of the game” by no longer requiring us to “justify our politics by the Constitution.” The essay, titled The Constitution Is Broken and Should Not Be Reclaimed, written by law professors Ryan D. Doerfler of Harvard and Samuel Moyn of Yale, claimed that when liberals “lose in the Supreme Court” they often blame justices for misreading the Constitution.” So, declared the duo: “Struggling over the Constitution has proved a dead end.” Translation: “Dissolve the Constitution and let us behave as radically as we choose to behave, justice be damned.” The two who wrote the essay must have been present when our Founders discussed whether or not the United States should be a republic or a democracy. The reasons the duo state why we should abolish the Constitution are the very reasons the Founders said we must have a constitution that protects us from democracy. A constitutional republic, ours specifically, limits the powers of government, it limits the powers of the majority and those in power. The Founders understood that “Real” Democracy is in fact a dictatorship. A Constitutional Republic, ours specifically, protects the liberties of the minority or those out of power from the whims of the majority. Our speech, which includes our thoughts, and our freedom to freely worship God, are under attack by the dictatorial left today. If not for the remnant of the Constitution that still exists, there would be even more political prisoners in the United States because we who would be prisoners would have voiced our thoughts that do not conform to the mob, and we would have prayed or quoted scripture in public, which the mob opposes. My latest book, “Republic or Democracy Does it Matter” will be in print soon and explains in detail the differences between a Constitutional Republic and “Real” Democracy. Get it, read it, and then decide which you prefer, the protection of the Constitution or the untethered whims and wishes of the left. There are many problems in the United States. There have always been problems. People have disagreed as to what the problems are and of course how to solve them. What do you believe our biggest problems are?
Inflation, crime, illegal immigration, taxes being too high or too low, government spending being too high or too low, power of all sorts being centralized or not centralized enough, federal government overreach or not enough government programs are problems. Schools not educating, or is it schools not indoctrinating enough, is it local and county governments demanding too much conformity or not enough conformity, is it people expected to be involved, informed, and interested, or should people only be expected to vote with information gathered just a day before elections, is it a government being dominated and controlled by unelected bureaucrats, or is it citizens rejecting the rules and regulations of these unelected bureaucrats. Ballots mailed to everybody, perhaps we should mail ballots and also place ballots in public places for anybody and everybody, or is it restricting voting to citizens who can prove who they are, is it having a voting season or should voting be restricted to one day and on paper ballots only, similar to what most free nations do today. We are a nation with huge problems. We as a nation must decide who and what we will be. These problems are not unique to the United States. Societies throughout history have had to solve these same basic problems. Before they could solve them, these people had to decide if they wanted to be a people free from government slavery, or if they wanted to be slaves to the state, reliant on the state for everything, desiring for the state to tell them how they must live their lives, choices they could make, and how they must think. A group of people known as American colonists faced these same problems in the 18th century. They determined they did not want to be slaves to the state. They formed a republic and rejected democracy. If they had done the opposite, they would have chosen democracy which would have meant slavery to an all-powerful majority. Now their posterity is facing the same situation. You are a part of the posterity. What will you choose? Although Fauci is known for contradicting himself, perhaps he does have inside information in his latest contradiction. It was not long ago that Fauci told us he would remain in his current position until the end of 2024. On July 18th of this year Fauci said that he plans to retire by the end of Big Guy Joe Biden's current term in office as the government's top infectious disease expert. Although Fauci headed the NIH, he has proven many times that he is not the top infectious disease expert when it comes to understanding infectious diseases.
Now we are told by Fauci that he will step down from his positions in the Biden regime in December. Fauci, the chief medical adviser to the president and longtime director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said he will be leaving those positions to “pursue the next chapter in my career.” “While I am moving on from my current positions, I am not retiring,” Fauci said in a statement. “After more than 50 years of government service, I plan to pursue the next phase of my career while I still have so much energy and passion for my field. I want to use what I have learned as NIAID Director to continue to advance science and public health and to inspire and mentor the next generation of scientific leaders as they help prepare the world to face future infectious disease threats.” Perhaps Fauci is better at understanding that a change in the makeup in Congress is going to happen. Fauci has certainly been told directly that his service over the last 50 years has been centered on politics, on receiving kickbacks, and on promoting research that is detrimental to public health and safety and has not been appreciated by people in congress, scientists, and health care workers including many doctors who are concerned with health issues. It would appear that Fauci understands he has greater flexibility to defend his self-serving 50 years as a private citizen than as a bureaucrat. Of course, given Fauci’s record, if he should believe that the election results would be different from what is expected today, he would announce that he will continue in his current position because the nation needs him. In Fauci speak that means that if the Democrats would continue to hold the House, he would be free to continue his self-serving. The United States was founded as an Individualist nation. Both Jamestown and Plymouth had been founded as Collectivist communities and were failing. They would not have survived had they not become Individualists. The example of Jamestown and Plymouth is based primarily on the economic differences between the two predominant philosophies.
In collectivism, it is some sort of group rather than an individual who is at the center of all social, political, and economic concerns, and issues. Those who are proponents of this ideology say that the interests and claims of groups (it may even be the state) supersede those of individuals. The mantra of the collectivist is that the individual must sacrifice their goals and achievements for the greater good. Collectivism is associated with government-controlled society such as Marxism, communism, socialism, progressivism, and the Democrat Party of today. Individualism understands that society is there, but it is ultimately made up of individuals who choose and act. Individualism has as its core the family unit. Individualism believes that private property is essential to the stability and advancement of mankind. Individualism is associated with individual liberty and rights, or a free society. The Individualist believes in individual responsibility and thus believes that their children are their responsibility. In an individualist society the values of the child often coincide with the values of the parents. The society is comprised of a wide variety of values. The Collectivist believes children are the property of the state and the values of the children must be the values of the state. Conformity to one set of values is the goal of Collectivism. The Collectivist mantra is that the values of the children can not be those of the parent or the church, but must be the values of the state. This is the battle that is being waged, not only in Virginia, but throughout the country. Who has ultimate responsibility for the child and what they are taught, the parent or the state? Who should determine what values are taught in schools? What schools should children be allowed to attend? Should the child be taken from the parent and become a ward of the state via policies such as Universal Pre-K? Marx said that the education of a child, from the time they can leave the care of their mother must be in a state institution. We are in a battle for the soul of America. We are seeing that battle being waged this very day. Will Virginia vote to once again adhere to the Individualist philosophy of children being the responsibility of the parent, or will the transformation of America to a Marxist totalitarian state be supported by electing a Collectivist who believes that the children are the property of the state, who believes that ultimately all thought must conform to the Collectivist ideology, who believes that individuals must surrender their dreams and desires to conform to the dictates of the state, who believes in total control of the state over all aspects of the individual and society. Yes, the Cheney showing in Wyoming was a great indicator to restore our republic. Wyoming told Cheney her false accusations of insurgency do not resonate on Main Street like they do on K Street. The Wyoming voters said the biggest threat to our republic are RINOS like her, the Democrat Party, and those who refuse to correct all that allowed the election in 2020 to be stolen.
As I do my daily searching of many different websites, those called neutral, liberal, and conservative, I am sensing a set up once again, especially in senate races. This makes sense, it would be easier for the left to perform their magic once again in 5 to 10 senate races than it would be in 50 house races. One set up would be Florida where DeSantis is comfortably ahead for governor, but Rubio is supposedly trailing a very weak Democrat in the senate race. We also saw the fix as it worked in the District Attorney recall in Los Angeles. Almost thirty percent of the signatures were disqualified. The review of signatures was done without any transparency and an audit has been denied. This is in contrast to having fewer than one percent of mail in votes being disqualified in the 2020 election. It is critical for the communist movement to retain control of the house or the senate. Just as it was critical for their transformation of the United States from a republic to a democracy and ultimately to a Marxist totalitarian state in 2020. Nobody with even an ounce of honesty would claim that Biden legitimately won that election. There were at least 20 million, more likely 30 million, false and manufactured Biden votes. Despite overwhelming evidence, the Communist Party of the United States (Democrats) and their useful idiots (RINOS) prevent an open and honest review. If Trump had been elected along with the house and senate, the corruption in DC would have been exposed, the deep state would have been dismantled, and the power structure would have dramatically changed. The Democrats and the Republican establishment are no different from a cornered wolverine, there is nothing they will not do to escape their predicament. We who are Freedom Loving Americans must work harder than we have ever worked if we are to restore the republic which limits the power of government and protects the liberties of the people. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2024
Categories |
RSS Feed