THE SUPREME COURT TO HEAR CRITICAL CASE

The Supreme Court allowed the Constitution to be further trashed as it remained silent while state Supreme Courts, local judges, governors, Secretary’s of State, local county officials, and big money oligarchs trashed a critical element of the United States Constitution.  
Article I, Section 4, Clause 1:
“The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.”
Despite the explicit statement that each State Legislature determines election law, the Supreme Court under the leadership of Chief Justice John Roberts, ignored the Constitution and allowed the most corrupt election to take place, an election that was clearly stolen, and now defended by Roberts, the Democrats, and RINOS.
Interesting how nobody, not even the Democrats or RINOS, no longer deny that the election was corrupt. Very few even deny it was stolen. They now argue that it is to late to correct it.
The current Supreme Court will determine if we must adhere to the Constitution and allow only State Legislatures to prescribe for their state. It has become common for courts, including state Supreme Courts to overrule State Legislatures when they do their Constitutionally prescribed task.
The Supreme Court will hear a North Carolina case called “Moore v Harper”. The one side is saying that the North Carolina Supreme Court does not have the authority to overrule the State Legislature redrawing of a congressional district map while the other side argues that courts have supreme power over elections.
If the Supreme Court rules that the Constitution of the United States is indeed the Supreme Law of the Land and that when it declares the State Legislatures, comprised of members elected by the people, is the final authority and not appointed judges, it would return all election authority to the Constitutionally designated authority.
If you disagree with where the power for elections should be held, that is fine. If you wish to place it in the hands of somebody else, the Constitution gives you the means of amending it. But let us pray, that this Supreme Court would again uphold the Supreme Law of the Land which is the United States Constitution.