HOURS OF SENSELESS DEBATE ON GUN CONTROL

Once again, the discussion is about which band-aide should be used to stop the leak in the dam.  The fact is none of the band-aides will work.  We can use the one with super duper adhesive, we can use the extra large one, or we can use the most absorbent one and nothing will change.  The dam that is threatening to collapse must be restored, or it will break. 
 
Pundit, politician, and citizen say the AR-15 cannot be sold, the age to buy guns must be raised, better back ground checks must be used, and on and on they go.  Meanwhile, the morality, ethics, and respect within our society continues to deteriorate, and that deterioration goes on not only unheeded, but encouraged. 
 
Karl Marx said that in order to transform a society to a classless society that is totally socially just, totally conforming, and totally equal, the transformers must obliterate all morality, all long-standing principles, and all religion from that society.  This obliteration has been active and ongoing within the United States and most all Western Society for at least the last 100 year.
 
When morality, long standing principles, and religion are obliterated, something must fill the void.  What has always filled the void are the forces of evil, those who would long to take what is not theirs, legally or illegally, those who would long to kill, legally or illegally, those who would seek to shirk their responsibility, and those who would seek to claim victim hood as opposed to self-responsibility. 
 
A welfare system, be it called a safety net system or compassion will always breed and cause evil.  A welfare system creates a segment of the population that becomes government reliant which brings about a lack of self-respect and destroys the family.  A society with a strong family unit will always be a society with far fewer people who deem it necessary to kill others.  And yes, welfare is nothing more than a system of legal robbery. 
 
We have a system that says it is not only a choice to kill others for any reason including convenience, but this murder is encouraged by a large segment of the population and in many cases funded by the government.  This murder is referred to “as a women’s right to choose,” but is in fact telling our population that human life has no value.  This widely accepted and encouraged manner of murder is telling our society that if the life of another is an inconvenience to you, you have every right to have that life extinguished.  Abortion is telling society that murder is right, and it is legal. 
 
We have a system that tells parents they do not have to, and in many instances the state prohibits them from disciplining or giving their children correction, especially if that discipline or correction is based on the teachings of the Bible.  We have a system that says children cannot be disciplined in school because of bad behavior, rudeness, or class disruption because that could harm the self-image of the child.  This system is supported by parents who sue the schools when their child is disciplined, and it is supported by school administrators and courts.  The Obama regime said that discipline could not be applied based on an individual basis, but discipline must be applied based on race ratios. 
 
We have a system that more and more is requiring that the state be responsible for all aspects of child development including but not limited to morality, religion, and academics.   A large number of parents encourage and support the state appropriating this responsibility because the parent can now be friend or just absent, but under any circumstances these parents believe they are freed from this tremendous responsibility.
 
So, to satisfy our need for believing we are doing something to correct a problem, we argue about the band-aide and allow the dam to continue to crumble.  The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) once again continues their onslaught against our Constitution and all it represents, and of course they believe they are mitigating the Bible, which can never be accomplished, even by the academic, political elite, or self- adjudicated important individual.  The useful idiot joins in this meaningless argument believing they are the defender of freedom.  The useful idiot then wins acclaim as opposed to the ridicule they would suffer if they instead insisted on restoring the dam.