CONTORTED ARGUMENTS OF LEFT ARE CONSISTENT

There are only two things about the left that have been consistent over the years. The left has been consistent in their inconsistencies. This is because of their second consistency; they stay true to their core strategy that the “ends always justify the means.” There are no limitations to how ridiculous an argument from the left will be so long as they believe they are advancing their agenda to transform any society to a Marxist totalitarian state.
There has been a transformation movement in the United States ever since Lenin started the Communist International and set the United States as his primary target. The movement gained momentum during the 1920’s and was well ingrained during the 1930’s. The communist movement dominated the Franklin Roosevelt regime led by Eleanor and Harry Hopkins.
It was during the 1930’s that Stalin was committing horrendous atrocities against the Russian people. Anybody Stalin thought might be a threat to him was a target along with their family members and even acquaintances. Nobody is sure how many people were murdered during this time. Stalin did hold show trials when he knew he had total control of a situation and the defendant would cooperate and confess to the false accusations.
The American left defended this murder. A letter was posted in a communist paper published in the Untied States, called the “Daily Worker.” It was argued that these murders were really brilliant maneuvers for freedom, democracy, and a superior kind of justice. A quote from the defense: “Your voice.....will lend even greater weight to the worldwide defense of the right of the individual to speak, write, create, and otherwise engage in cultural activity in complete freedom.”
The American left, which has the identical ideology today as it had then, is claiming that the change in ownership of Twitter will hinder free speech and hurt democracy. “You could secretly ban one party’s candidate or all of its candidates, all of its nominees. Or you could just secretly turn down the reach of their stuff and turn up the reach of something else, and the rest of us might not even find out until after the election. Elon Musk says this is all to help people because he is just a free speech, philosophically clear, open-minded helper, a world helper, if you will. Is that true? Should you take him at his word? Should you care about this whether you have a Twitter account or not? This is important stuff,” said a host on MSNBC.
What is stated above is the very reason Musk said he wanted to purchase Twitter. That reason was to be sure that the left and the right both had a voice. Previously Twitter only allowed the voice of the left. Musk said he no longer wanted major stories like the Hunter Biden laptop to be censored from the public. Musk said he wanted to stop censorship of any kind. Remember the left demands conformity and complicity. When they deny any who do not conform of comply, it is not censorship, but it is serving the democracy.
The one area the left of the 1930’s and 40’s, and the left of today, get right, is that Stalin’s actions and the censorship on Twitter, do and did promote democracy. The call for promoting democracy is terribly misunderstood. Democracy does not promote freedom. Democracy will always bring dictatorship. Democracy has no limitations or restrictions on what the majority or those in power can do. This is why the founder’s rejected democracy. It was their purpose to limit the powers of government and protect the freedoms and liberties of the people. That is what a republic does.