ARE HONEST ELECTIONS CRITICAL

Both sides would answer yes to the above question. Both sides would say that they only want legal votes counted and counted correctly.
Yet, one side does not want accurate election roles. That side wants ballots sent to all people on the role, that would be people who have died, that would be people who have moved not just locally but outside the state, that would be people who registered when they applied for a driver’s license even though they are not a citizen. This side also claims that anybody should be able to “harvest” these ballots and claim it is discriminatory if there is any attempt to verify who completed the ballot.
Yet one side claims that voting machines that have been proven to be manipulated, that have been proven to be connected to the internet, that have been proven to be influenced by servers outside the country cannot and must not be challenged.
Yet one side is claiming that any legitimate audit of election results is discriminatory and must not be conducted. Today, Marc Elias, the election fixer for the side that claims they want honest elections but does everything they can to fix elections, is attempting to prevent an honest audit of the election results in Maricopa County in the 2020 election.
Elias and his team of attorneys attempted last week to pressure four auditing firms into withdrawing—and even get them to flip on the Arizona lawmakers—asserting that any efforts to verify the 2020 election results could be construed as violations of the Civil Rights Act and other federal statutes.
It is not what they claim, it is what they do. Remember, the side described above also says that any means justify the ends.
What do you support? Do you support honest elections, or do you support verbalizing that honest elections are important but doing everything you can to have elections determined by vote counters and not legal voters? Be careful how you answer this. If you support the Uni party, you support the “Yet one side claims.”